Cases 61 - 70 of 656
Henderson v. Lafavers et al
as 4:2021cv01311
Plaintiff:
Michael Henderson
Defendant:
James Lafavers, James Randall Smith, Jeffery Marton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pool v. CitiBank
as 5:2021cv01129
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lamont Pool
Defendant:
Citibank and T.D.C.J. Inmate Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2021cv01024
Defendant:
Thompson Prometric, U.S. Attorney General, Kim Ogg and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richie v. Srubar et al
as 4:2021cv03738
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Alan Richie
Defendant:
Shannon Srubar, Captain R. Rodriguez, K. Kubenaua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pool v. CitiBank
as 6:2021cv00439
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lamont Pool
Defendant:
CitiBank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slayton v. Grace et al
as 4:2021cv03603
Plaintiff:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Defendant:
Joshua Bernard Grace, Dr. Jeffery Lewis, Houston Area Masonic Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beechum v. Hunter et al
as 6:2021cv00370
Plaintiff:
Christina Beechum
Defendant:
Tonnette Hunter, Anointed Touch, Inc. doing business as AT Logistics, Ruan Transport Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Johnas Morgan
Cross Defendant:
Anointed Touch LLC and Anointed Touch, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Perez v. Lumpkin et al
as 2:2021cv00201
Plaintiff:
Francisco U. Perez
Defendant:
Bobbie Lumpkin, Jeffery Richardson and Timothy C. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King, Jr. v. Richardson et al
as 4:2021cv02952
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffery S Richardson, Terry Bursoh, Tracy Hutto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe v. Cash
as 3:2021cv01814
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
Mario Keni Cash, Zane E Kitchen, Deanna M Tzmodgen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
