Cases 61 - 70 of 290
Kelly et al v. Walt Disney Parks And Resorts U.S., Inc.
as 6:2022cv01919
Plaintiff:
EK, MP, E.K and others
Defendant:
WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS, U.S., INC. and Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Westbrook v. Ek et al
as 2:2022cv02224
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Westbrook
Defendant:
Dr. Ek and Wexford Health Sources Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves v. Chacon et al
as 2:2022cv02201
Plaintiff:
Russell A Reeves
Defendant:
Jennifer Chacon and Dr. Ek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Brown v. Adkins et al
as 2:2022cv02167
Plaintiff:
Steven Brown
Defendant:
. Adkins, . Ek and Danville Health Care Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victor Santos-Ek v. Mark Nooth
as 22-35578
Petitioner / Appellant:
VICTOR ASUNCION SANTOS-EK
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK NOOTH
Ek-Avilez v. Garland
as 22-1128
Petitioner:
REYES MIGUEL EK-AVILEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kent Allen, Jr. v. Daniel Ek, et al
as 22-7089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kent Allen, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Daniel Ek, CEO of Spotify, Kiari Cephus and Kent Allen
General Motors LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv03002
Plaintiff:
General Motors LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Aa sweety 666 Store, AEING Official Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Coe v. Jeffreys et al
as 2:2022cv02115
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Coe
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Justin Young, Jonathan Ek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
