Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Posselli v. Jensen et al
as 2:2010cv00141
Plaintiff:
Brett Posselli
Defendant:
Dennie Jensen, Dennie Hamilton, Hillary Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lohle v. Aramark et al
as 2:2009cv01034
Plaintiff:
Patricia M. Lohle
Defendant:
Aramark and Aramark Lake Powell Resorts and Marinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Powell et al v. IBP Inc et al
as 2:2009mc00490
Plaintiff:
Steven Lewis Powell and Brenda Powell
Defendant:
IBP Inc, IBP Inc, Royal Express and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Campbell et al v. Castle Stone Homes et al
as 2:2009cv00250
Plaintiff:
Darrell Campbell, Filiberto Vera, Galen Merrell and others
Defendant:
Castle Stone Homes, Martin Tanner, Mills Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Powell v. Huntsman et al
as 2:2009cv00155
Plaintiff:
Maxwell C. Powell
Defendant:
Jon Huntsman, Jr., Tom Patterson, Warden Turley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Christensen et al v. Neurosurgical Clinic of Utah et al
as 2:2009cv00141
Plaintiff:
Joan Christensen and Arthur Christensen
Defendant:
Neurosurgical Clinic of Utah, Neurosurgical Clinic of Utah, Powel, Chester Badollet Estate of and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Pirela v. Carver et al
as 2:2008cv00651
Petitioner:
Edwin Mitchell Pirela
Respondent:
Scott Carver, Mike Chabries, Tom Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pirela v. Carver et al
as 2:2008cv00556
Plaintiff:
Edwin Mitchell Pirela
Defendant:
Scott Carver, Mike Chabries, Lowell Clark and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
