Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Armstrong et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 2:2009cv00003
Plaintiff:
Christine F. Armstrong and Nicolee L. Torrey
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Ladd v. Thibault et al
as 1:2008cv00255
Plaintiff:
Eugene F. Ladd
Defendant:
Deborah Thibault, Paul Heath, Richard Plank and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ball v. Chun et al
as 1:2008cv00247
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ball, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy S. Chun and Colin F. Clifford
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Millennial Homes, LLC v. Town of Hartford, Vermont et al
as 1:2008cv00154
Plaintiff:
Millennial Homes, LLC
Defendant:
Hartford, Vermont, Town of, Hunter F. Rieseberg and Cedarcrest Fund, LP
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boivin et al v. Town of Addison et al
as 2:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Boivin and Paul A. Boivin
Defendant:
Addison, Town of, Richard Pratt, Alyce Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 2:2007cv00224
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Patrick J. Leahy, G. W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ladd v. Hofmann
as 1:2007cv00176
Petitioner:
Eugene F. Ladd
Respondent:
Robert Hofmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ladd v. Hofmann
as 1:2007cv00174
Petitioner:
Eugene F. Ladd
Respondent:
Robert Hofmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Mooney et al
as 2:2007cv00171
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gladys F. Mooney, Concord, Town of and 475 Kirby Mountain Road, Concord, VT 05824
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
