Cases 61 - 70 of 4,226
Gomez v. Liam Homes Holdings, LLC
as 1:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Garey C. Gomez
Defendant:
Liam Homes Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
SULLIVAN v. WARD et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WALTER BARRY, WARDEN DARRIN MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Fifth & Lenox Holding
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Garey C. Gomez
Defendant:
Fifth & Lenox Holding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
MCKISSIC v. RAWLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
CARLTON MCKISSIC
Defendant:
C RAWLING, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DENNIS v. BARNARD et al
as 7:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DENNIS
Defendant:
TERRY E BARNARD, JACQUELINE BUNN, DAVID HERRING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrigan v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Harrington and Jonathan Harrigan
Defendant:
Xavier Anderson, C & E Delivery, Inc. and Protective Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
A. et al v. Carlson et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Isaac A., Zack B., Leon C. and others
Defendant:
Russel Carlson, Kevin Tanner and Candice L. Broce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Longo v. United States Government et al
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Longo
Defendant:
United States Government and Matthew M. Graves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Sungdo Eng USA, Inc. v. Hyoungwon Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06025
Plaintiff:
Sungdo Eng USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Hyoungwon Inc., Hyoungwon E&C America, Inc., Ju Ho Lee and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
