Cases 61 - 70 of 11,453
Farmer v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
Charles M Farmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
M&H Development, LLC v. Covington Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
M&H Development, LLC
Defendant:
Covington Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueda v Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cesar Rueda
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillespie et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Christoper M. Gillespie and Natalie D. Gillespie
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Stover v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
M. Andrew Stover
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
