Cases 61 - 69 of 69
v. Wiggins et al
as 1:2007cv01040
Plaintiff:
Cory Alexander-Lee Wiggins
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Virginia Beach Circuit Court, Norfolk Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Kelly
as 1:2007cv00966
Petitioner:
Marcus L. Wiggins
Respondent:
Loretta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiggins v. Unknown
as 1:2007cv00890
Plaintiff:
Cory Alexander-Lee Wiggins
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Personal Property)
S.I., a minor, by his mother and next friend, L.I. v. Fishburne-Hudgins Educational Foundation, INC. et al
as 5:2007cv00083
Plaintiff:
S.I., a minor, by his mother and next friend, L.I. and S.I., a minor, by his mother and next friend, L.I.
Defendant:
Fishburne-Hudgins Educational Foundation, INC., R.M. and David K. Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wiggins v. Hampton Circuit Court et al
as 1:2007mc00024
Plaintiff:
Cory Alexander-Lee Wiggins
Defendant:
Hampton Circuit Court, Norfolk Circuit Court, Sussex I State Prison and others
Wiggins v. Kelly
as 1:2007cv00536
Petitioner:
Cory Alexander-Lee Wiggins
Respondent:
Loretta K. Kelly
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
v. Wiggins et al
as 1:2007cv00455
Plaintiff:
Cory Alexander-Lee Wiggins
Defendant:
Treasury of the Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Johnson
as 3:2007cv00211
Petitioner:
Edward L. Wiggins
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiggins v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 1:2007cv00242
Plaintiff:
Cory Alexander-Lee Wiggins
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Virginia, Hampton Circuit Court, Virginia Beach Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
