Cases 61 - 70 of 211
Hunt-McFadden v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01914
Plaintiff:
Youlanda Hunt-McFadden
Defendant:
John Does #1-3, Walmart, Inc. doing business as Wal-Mart Store #3786 and ABC Corps. #1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Frame v. Diversified Maintenance Systems, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01293
Defendant:
Diversified Maintenance Systems, LLC, Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc., ABC Corps. 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Aniefiok Frame
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NESMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv04700
Plaintiff:
MARQUISE S NESMITH
Defendant:
AMARA S AHMED, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NESMITH S MARQUELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Merales v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2021cv00048
Plaintiff:
Therisa Merales
Defendant:
ABC Corps. #1-3, John Does #1-3 and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Regal Cinemas, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05245
Defendant:
Regal Cinemas, Inc., John Does 1-3 and ABC Corps. 1-3
Plaintiff:
Meshondria Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abreu et al v. Torti Food, Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv10643
Plaintiff:
Ramon Abreu
Defendant:
Demetria Chapman, Torti Food, Corp. agent of d/b/a Mirador Restaurant, Jose Perez and others
Selestan v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2020cv00282
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, ABC Corps. #1-3 and John Does #1-3
Plaintiff:
Kayla Selestan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diaz v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2020cv00275
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, ABC Corps. #1-3 and John Does #1-3
Plaintiff:
Lillian Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kelly v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2020cv03133
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Kelly
Defendant:
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.,, ABC Corps. #1-3, John Does #1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09555
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
