Cases 61 - 70 of 791
Turner v. Saul
as 3:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Judith T Turner
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Roundtree-McCrorey et al v. State Treasurer Office et al
as 3:2022cv00455
Plaintiff:
Anjaknie Roundtree-McCrorey, Andrew McCrorey, Jr and Mattie P McCrorey
Defendant:
State Treasurer Office, City Hall, State Capital and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Komarow et al v. Breitsprecher et al
as 3:2022cv00453
Petitioner:
Andrew Komarow and Komarow Financial Planning, LLC
Respondent:
Craig Breitsprecher and Breitsprecher and Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Komarow et al v. Breitsprecher et al
as 2:2022cv00453
Petitioner:
Andrew Komarow and Komarow Financial Planning, LLC
Defendant:
Breitsprecher and Associates, LLC
Respondent:
Craig Breitsprecher
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Andrews v. Vatti
as 3:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Andrews
Defendant:
Dave Vatti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Andrews v. Vatti
as 3:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Andrews
Defendant:
Dave Vatti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Andrews v. Vatti
as 3:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Andrews
Defendant:
Dave Vatti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Andrews v. Vatti
as 3:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Andrews
Defendant:
S. Dave Vatti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
