Cases 61 - 70 of 545
Garcia v. Rios et al
as 2:2022cv00507
Petitioner:
Louis Garcia
Respondent:
Hector Rios, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. Horton, et al
as 22-2030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYCE FRANKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU HORTON, Warden and HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Ortega v. Santistevan, et al
as 22-2029
Petitioner / Appellant:
NIEVES SONNY ORTEGA
Respondent / Appellee:
DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden and HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Frazier v. Brown, et al
as 22-2022
Petitioner / Appellant:
JARRELL FRAZIER
Respondent / Appellee:
FNU BROWN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Skaggs v. Santistevan et al
as 2:2022cv00050
Petitioner:
Jason Skaggs
Respondent:
Dwayne Santistevan and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
as 2:2021cv01102
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Rodriguez
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ellis v. Smith, et al
as 21-2122
Petitioner / Appellant:
GENE GILBERT ELLIS, III
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND SMITH, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Castaneda v. Santistevan, et al
as 21-2121
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLAUDIO R. CASTANEDA
Respondent / Appellee:
DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Stallings v. Santistevan, et al
as 21-2115
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICK G. STALLINGS
Respondent / Appellee:
DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Serrano v. Vigil-Richards et al
as 1:2021cv00630
Petitioner:
Santana Serrano
Respondent:
Jessica Vigil-Richards and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
