Cases 61 - 70 of 114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00001
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02770
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Owens v. ReconTrust Company NA et al
as 2:2010cv02696
Plaintiff:
Dannielle Owens
Defendant:
ReconTrust Company NA , BAC Home Loans Servicing LP , Bank of America NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Bawden v. ReconTrust Company NA et al
as 2:2010cv02584
Plaintiff:
Julianne Green Bawden
Defendant:
ReconTrust Company NA, BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, First American Title and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rangel et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP et al
as 3:2010cv08234
Plaintiff:
Louis S Rangel and Laurie C Rangel
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and Darla Sproles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Rimbey v. First Magnus Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv02563
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Rimbey
Defendant:
First Magnus Financial Corporation, BAC Home Loans Servicing LP , Countrywide Home Loans Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rangel et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP et al
as 3:2010cv08233
Plaintiff:
Louis S Rangel and Laurie C Rangel
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and Darla Sproles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Finocchi v. Bank of America NA et al
as 2:2010cv02320
Plaintiff:
Joseph Finocchi
Defendant:
Bank of America NA , BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and ReconTrust Company NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vidal v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP
as 4:2010cv00630
Plaintiff:
Amanda Vidal
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hu v. Bank of America NA et al
as 4:2010cv00627
Plaintiff:
Paul Y Hu
Defendant:
Bank of America NA and BAC Home Loans Servicing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
