Cases 61 - 70 of 127
Baker v. USA
as 6:2015cv01099
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dexter Dewayne Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Vitrano v. Maye et al
as 5:2015cv03048
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Vitrano
Defendant:
Claude Maye, J. Bailey and (fnu) Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker v. Stevens et al
as 5:2015cv03032
Plaintiff:
Caleb Sam Baker
Defendant:
(fnu) Stevens and (fnu) Carns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Baker
as 2:2014cv02629
Petitioner:
Lisa Jane Baker
Respondent:
David Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603
Baker v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2014cv01406
Plaintiff:
Travis Shane Baker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Coshocton Grain Company v. Caldwell-Baker Company
as 2:2014cv02589
Plaintiff:
Coshocton Grain Company
Defendant:
Caldwell-Baker Company
Counter_claimant:
Caldwell-Baker Company
Counter_defendant:
Coshocton Grain Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Baker et al v. DesLauriers et al
as 6:2014cv01356
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Baker, David E. Benton, Sr., Richard L. Cochran and others
Defendant:
Austin DesLauriers, Sean Wagner, Tom Kinlen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker et al v. Coxcom, LLC et al
as 6:2014cv01324
Defendant:
Coxcom, LLC , Coxcom, Inc. and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance Newhouse Partnership
Plaintiff:
Dennis Baker and Lynn Talbott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2014cv01271
Plaintiff:
David Lee Baker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2014cv03139
Plaintiff:
Larry James Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, United States Army, Monty William Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
