Cases 61 - 70 of 148
BULLARD v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv05158
Plaintiff:
JAMES BULLARD
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL, DEPUTY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUDNIK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv05034
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. BUDNIK
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY and JOHN DOE, WARDEN OR "SUPERINTENDENT"
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEELER v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2021cv04944
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN SHEELER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., BLANCHE CARNEY, WARDEN JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEWELL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv04942
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SEWELL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. GIANETTA et al
as 2:2021cv04962
Petitioner:
JOSEPH SIMMONS
Respondent:
NANCY GIANETTA, C/O PETERS, C/O COLLIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAVAGE v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv04612
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EDWARD SAVAGE
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, PIERRE LACOMBE and CORIZON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARDONA v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv04376
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY CARDONA
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, C/O ANTWI, O. FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUPLESSIS v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv04377
Plaintiff:
RICARDO DUPLESSIS
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, O. FORD, C/O ANTWI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAVAGE v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv04136
Plaintiff:
RASHAN I. SAVAGE and RASHAN- I: SAVAGE
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JENNINGS, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARGROVE et al v. CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al.
as 2:2021cv04082
Plaintiff:
RODNEY HARGROVE and CINDY HARGROVE
Defendant:
CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
