Cases 61 - 70 of 174
Erby v. 201 Poplar Ave/Shelby County Sheriff Jail et al
as 2:2022cv02805
Plaintiff:
Richard G. Erby
Defendant:
201 Poplar Ave/Shelby County Sheriff Jail, Floyd Bonner and Donna W. Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Bonner
as 2:2022cv02472
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2022cv02442
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner and Tennessee State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Bonner
as 2:2022cv02291
Petitioner:
Terry Edwards and Torry Edwards
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2022cv02287
Petitioner:
Wendolyn Lee
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner, Chris Craft and Amy Weirich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Bonner
as 2:2022cv02113
Petitioner:
Kiara Jones
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scanlan v. Bonner et al
as 2:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Scanlan
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Kirk Fields and Shelby County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Bonner et al
as 2:2021cv02802
Plaintiff:
Marino Frazier
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Kirk Fields and Lee Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Craft et al
as 2:2021cv02774
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Chris Craft, Amy Weirich, James Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00911
Plaintiff:
Reginald A. Bonner
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., National Diagnostics, Inc. and Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 480
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
