Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 185
Bradford v. Kelly We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00293
Petitioner: Travell LaMonte Bradford
Respondent: Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Albrecht et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00196
Plaintiff: Daniel Fowler, Toren Pruden, Charles Withrow and others
Defendant: Sue Washburn, Paula Myers, Ken Jeske and others
Petitioner: Miles Erb, Leroy Lamont Wells and Serafin Pahua-Pahua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv00127
Defendant: Hendricks, SCI Medical, OSP Medical and others
Plaintiff: Joshua Michael Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Kelly et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00077
Defendant: Brandon Kelly and Cpl. Stair
Plaintiff: Tariq Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Figueroa v. Brown et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00079
Defendant: SCI Medical, Sup. Hendricks, Kate Brown and others
Plaintiff: David Bruce Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lux v. Kelly We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00004
Petitioner: Evan P. Lux
Respondent: Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cuevas v. DOJ et al
as 6:2020cv02281
Respondent: Brandon Kelly and DOJ
Petitioner: Santos Cuevas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Donald Odoms v. Brandon Kelly, et al
as 20-36115
Petitioner / Appellant: DONALD C. ODOMS
Respondent / Appellee: OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION and BRANDON KELLY
Muhammad v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv02153
Defendant: Governor Kate Brown, Oregon Dept. of Corrections, C.O. K. Williams and others
Plaintiff: Tariq Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv02127
Defendant: Governor Kate Brown, Dir. Colette Peters, Oregon Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff: Tariq Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?