Cases 61 - 70 of 139
VALENTINE v. DMYTRYK et al
as 2:2015cv01294
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VALENTINE
Defendant:
STEPHEN DMYTRYK, MICHAEL SPICER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCAIN v. DMYTRYK et al
as 2:2015cv01295
Plaintiff:
BRAHEEM MCCAIN
Defendant:
STEPHEN DMYTRYK, MICHAEL SPICER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCAIN v. DMYTRYK et al
as 2:2015cv01296
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MCCAIN
Defendant:
STEPHEN DMYTRYK, MICHAEL SPICER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAMMONS v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv00399
Plaintiff:
LEONARD SAMMONS
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANTIAGO v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
CONFESSOR SANTIAGO
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN SPEISER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NAVARRO v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv00140
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL NAVARRO
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN SPEISER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TOLLOIVER et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS TOLLOIVER and JOHN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOSEPH MCCLOSKEY, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
SEAN MITCHELL
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN SPEISER, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv07195
Plaintiff:
BRAHIEM CARTER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN L. SPEISER, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOMINICK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv07057
Plaintiff:
EDWARD DOMINICK
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PERRY BETTS, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
