Cases 61 - 70 of 92
B.C. Produce, Inc. et al v. Lowell Bros. & Bailey, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10794
Plaintiff:
B.C. Produce, Inc. , Boston Tomato & Packaging, LLC , Coosemans Boston, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Lowell Bros. & Bailey, Inc., Andrew C. Sexeny and George E. Sexeny
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Mutual Produce Corp. v. Lowell Bros. & Bailey, Inc., et.al
as 1:2012cv10774
Plaintiff:
Mutual Produce Corp.
Defendant:
Lowell Bros. & Bailey, Inc., Andrew C. Sexeny and George Sexeny
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Charles Langone,, et.al v. Lowell Bros. & Bailey, Inc.
as 1:2012cv10725
Plaintiff:
Charles Langone and New England Teamsters And Trucking Industry Pension Fund
Defendant:
Lowell Bros. & Bailey, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Carol Blanchard v. Lowell Bros. & Bailey, Inc.
as 1:2012cv10577
Plaintiff:
Carol Blanchard
Defendant:
Lowell Bros. & Bailey, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Rogers v. Boston Pads, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv11890
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers
Defendant:
Michael Swann, Lakeya Rochelle, Gustavo Payano and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
T-Mobile Northeast LLC et al v. City of Lowell et al
as 1:2011cv11551
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC and US Wireless, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Lowell , City of Lowell Zoning Board of Appeals , Kevin C. Ahern and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Abramson v. Perrin et al
as 1:2011cv11158
Plaintiff:
John Abramson
Defendant:
Michael W. Perrin , Ken Bailey and Camp Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc. v. Bailey Perrin Bailey LLP
as 1:2011cv10866
Plaintiff:
Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Bailey Perrin Bailey LLP
Counter_claimant:
Bailey Perrin Bailey LLP
Counter_defendant:
Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
