Cases 61 - 70 of 613
Clayton v. Murray, et al
as 6:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
Ernest Clayton
Defendant:
Dennis Murray, Emmitt Donahue, Brian Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OUTLAW v. OWENS et al
as 5:2016cv00456
Plaintiff:
CALVIN OUTLAW
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, TERRY E BARNARD, ALBERT MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBBLE v. OWENS et al
as 1:2016cv00177
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, U S GOVERNMENT and PETE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBBLE v. OWENS et al
as 4:2016cv00322
Respondent:
BRIAN OWENS and PETE SMITH
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cobble v. U. S. Government et al
as 1:2016cv03537
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Respondent:
U. S. Government, Brian Owens, Pete Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cobble v. United States Government et al
as 1:2016cv02921
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Respondent:
United States Government, Brian Owens, Victor Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hesterlee v. Owens et al
as 1:2016cv02580
Plaintiff:
Neal F. Hesterlee
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Derek Boehringer, Terry Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fischer et al v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
Angela Fischer and James Fischer
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections , Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia for Georgia Correctional Healthcare , Brian Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
COBBLE v. US GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2016cv00097
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
US GOVERNMENT, PETE SMITH and BRIAN OWENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRYANT v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2016cv00206
Plaintiff:
VONTERRY M BRYANT
Defendant:
STANLEY WILLIAMS, SMOKES, MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
