Cases 61 - 68 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07882
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Watson v. Cardinal Health, Inc.
as 7:2010cv09695
Defendant:
Cardinal Health, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tommy Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McKinney v. Cardinal Health, Corp et al
as 1:2009cv04594
Plaintiff:
Roxana McKinney
Defendant:
Cardinal Health, Corp and Deutsche Bank, AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Notice of Removal
Cardinal Health 110, Inc. v. Priority Pharmaceutical Svcs, LLC
as 1:2007cv01005
Plaintiff:
Cardinal Health 110, Inc. and Cardinal Health 110, Inc.
Defendant:
Priority Pharmaceutical Svcs, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv08288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cardinal Health, Inc.
as 1:2007cv06709
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, United States Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Defendant:
Cardinal Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
RxUSA Wholesale, Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 2:2006cv03447
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Healthcare Distribution Management Association, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
RxUSA Wholesale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Altamont Phar Inc et al v. Abbott Labs et al
as 1:2002cv02121
Plaintiff:
Roth-Matteo Drug Store, Inc., Bandy Drugs, Bowman's Pharmacy South, Inc. doing business as Bowman's Southtowne Pharmacy and others
Defendant:
American Cyanamid Company, Upjohn Co., Ciba-Geigy Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
