Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 175
Aleksey Ruderman v. Chad Kolitwenzew
as 20-2312
Petitioner: ALEKSEY ARKADYEVICH RUDERMAN
Respondent: CHAD KOLITWENZEW
Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pitts v Downey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv02208
Defendant: Dan Reedy, Unknown Chester Maximum Security Mental Health Center DHS Employees, Jim Rowe and others
Plaintiff: Jacob P Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Kolitwenzew
as 3:2020cv03178
Respondent: Chad Kolitwenzew
Petitioner: Ivan J Walton
Interested Party: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jacob Pitts v. Michael Downey, et al
as 20-2255
Defendant / Appellee: TREVOR TAYLOR, Correctional Officer, MICHAEL DOWNEY, Kankakee County Sheriff, CHAD KOLITWENZEW, Director of JCDC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JACOB P. PITTS
Juan M. Hernandez v. Chad Kolitwenzew, et al
as 20-2209
Petitioner: JUAN M. HERNANDEZ
Respondent: CHAD KOLITWENZEW
Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pitts v. Downey et al
as 2:2020cv02178
Defendant: . Coffey, J LeSage, . Norton and others
Plaintiff: Jacob P Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Downey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv02160
Defendant: United States Marshals, Sheri L Wong, Chad Kolitwenzew and others
Plaintiff: Drake Louis Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02138
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv02135
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walton v. Kolitwenzew
as 2:2020cv02130
Respondent: Chad Kolitwenzew
Petitioner: Ivan J Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?