Cases 61 - 70 of 151
Ortiz-Carrasquillo v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00425
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Petitioner:
Giovanni Janick Ortiz and Giovanni Janick Ortiz-Carrasquillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz-Carrasquillo v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00368
Petitioner:
Giovanni Janick Ortiz-Carrasquillo and Giovanni Janick Ortiz
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adames v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Alexander Adames
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pope v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00357
Petitioner:
Jered C. Pope
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00360
Defendant:
Joseph D. Bateman, David Anderson, River North Correctional Center MDT Team and others
Plaintiff:
Deonta J. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Defendant:
Mr. Brown, Kyle Rosch, Officer Clark and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicklin v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00886
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Petitioner:
Mondale Leon Hicklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelton v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Elwood Shelton
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicklin v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Mondale Leon Hicklin
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00331
Petitioner:
Joseph Ortiz
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
