Cases 61 - 70 of 181
McKinnie v. Heerdt et al
as 1:2017cv07963
Plaintiff:
Steven McKinnie
Defendant:
The Municipal City of Chicago Police and Edward Heerdt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcorn v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv05859
Plaintiff:
Lisa C Alcorn
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , City Of Chicago Police Department, Officer Daniel Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. City of Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2017cv05740
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Nelson
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police Dept., Sergeant Boffo, Sergeant Bucki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galeana v. City of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv04087
Plaintiff:
Juan Jesus Galeana
Defendant:
City Of Chicago Police Department and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Brock v. City Of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv03393
Plaintiff:
Lester Brock
Defendant:
City Of Chicago Police Department , A. Bruno , K P Hervai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brooks v. Wisz et al
as 1:2017cv02851
Plaintiff:
Jawone Brooks
Defendant:
Donald E. Wisz, Matthew J. Pasko, Joseph B. Foley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Valentin et al
as 1:2017cv01556
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Defendant:
Antonio Valentin, Noel Esquivel, Carlos Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Valentin et al
as 1:2017cv01445
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Defendant:
Antonio Valentin, Noel Esquivel, Carlos Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford v. City of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv00456
Plaintiff:
Bobby Sanford
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police Department, Lee #1638, Johnson #8265 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
