Cases 61 - 70 of 115
SMITH et al v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv80438
Plaintiff:
NORMAN FOREST SMITH, SR. and OVEDA D. SMITH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, ACANDS, INC., COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72641
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE D. SMITH
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72634
Plaintiff:
GARY D. SMITH
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72630
Plaintiff:
BRUCE D SMITH
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72636
Plaintiff:
GLENWOOD D. SMITH
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv02969
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pocono Mountain Charter School et al v. Pocono Mountain School District et al
as 3:2010cv01171
Plaintiff:
Pocono Mountain Charter School , Kinchasa Jackson , Kenya Williamson and others
Defendant:
Pocono Mountain School District, Dwight Pfenning, Henry E. Bockelman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67651
Plaintiff:
ALBERT D. SMITH
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. AC AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2010cv62271
Plaintiff:
ALBERT D. SMITH, JR. and AURELIA SMITH
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34118
Plaintiff:
GARY D. SMITH
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
