Cases 61 - 70 of 472
Sanchez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benenfits
Blandin v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Blandin
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, New Mexico Department of Public Safety, Marc Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brick v. Darnell et al
as 1:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Tisha Brick
Defendant:
Elaine Darnell, Kendra Otis, Lee Widner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Caouette v. Barela et al
as 2:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
David Caouette and Daniel Caouette
Defendant:
Jennifer Barela and Law Offices of the Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daigle v. Mathew et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Claudia Daigle
Defendant:
Francis J. Mathew, Julie J Vargas, John P Hays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farm Bureau Property and Casualty Company v. Daniel et al
as 1:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Farm Bureau Property and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Catherine Daniel and Joshua Langworthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Saavedra v. Western Refining Retail, LLC
as 1:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Danielle Saavedra
Defendant:
Western Refining Retail, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wasserburger et al v. Gonzales
as 1:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Tracy Wasserburger and Jeff Wasserburger
Defendant:
Eloy Daniel Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lare v. Supreme Maintenance Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jerham Daniel Lare
Defendant:
Supreme Maintenance Inc. and Wade Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sisk v. Energy Inspection Services, LLC
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sisk
Defendant:
Energy Inspection Services, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
