Cases 61 - 70 of 109
WILLIAMS v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2017cv02531
Plaintiff:
CLINT J. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HOLMES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv01674
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TERRILL HOLMES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
DOE et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv01597
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 1 , JANE DOE 2 , JANE DOE 3 and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP , JAMES N. MATTIS , JOSEPH F. DUNFORD, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2017cv01355
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
AGILITY PUBLIC WAREHOUSING COMPANY KSCP v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2016cv01837
Plaintiff:
AGILITY PUBLIC WAREHOUSING COMPANY KSCP
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ASHTON B. CARTER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2016cv01020
Plaintiff:
CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SINGH v. CARTER et al
as 1:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
SIMRATPAL SINGH
Defendant:
ASHTON B. CARTER , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , PATRICK J. MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHAMBERS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2016cv00339
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. CHAMBERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01213
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2015cv01208
Plaintiff:
HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
