Cases 61 - 70 of 260
Ajay Sinha v. Evelyn Upchurch, et al
as 08-3192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AJAY KUMAR SINHA
Defendant - Appellee:
EVELYN UPCHURCH, MARK HANSEN, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
ADJEI et al v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv00832
Plaintiff:
KWABENA ADJEI, MARY ADJEI, EUNICE ADJEI and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JOHN E. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Shi v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2008cv00901
Plaintiff:
Hongtao Shi
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ahmed et al v. Swacina et al
as 1:2008cv20365
Plaintiff:
Saghir Ahmed
Defendant:
Linda Swacina, Michael Mukasey, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008at00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
VINOGRADOVA v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00211
Plaintiff:
TATIANA VINOGRADOVA and TATIANA VINOGRADOVA
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lee v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2008cv01022
Plaintiff:
Jinyoung Lee
Defendant:
Emilio T. Gonzalez, Evelyn Upchurch, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
