Cases 61 - 70 of 510
Matthew Khorsandi v. Floyd Mitchell et al
as 2:2021cv05884
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KHORSANDI
Defendant:
FLOYD MITCHELL, KEITH TURKOWSKI, TOOLSY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sylvester Floyd v. Rick M. Hill
as 2:2021cv05767
Petitioner:
Sylvester Floyd
Respondent:
Rick M. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
County Board of Arlington County, Virginia et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv05294
Plaintiff:
County Board of Arlington County, Virginia, Fairfax County Board Of Supervisors, Chesterfield County, VA and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company Inc and McKinsey & Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonnie L. Franklin v. DiDi Global Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05486
Plaintiff:
Bonnie L. Franklin
Defendant:
DiDi Global Inc., Will Wei Cheng, Jean Qing Liu and others
Petitioner:
Fah Liew, Allen Floyd, Tao Zha and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Floyd v. Elite 1 Financial Services LLC
as 5:2021cv04441
Plaintiff:
Louis Floyd
Defendant:
Elite 1 Financial Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Hooper et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv04283
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Treitner, Cory M. Bynum, Dwayne Smith and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Threde et al v. Brandrep LLC
as 3:2021cv03013
Plaintiff:
Louis Floyd, J. Scott Threde, Maria Schaffer and others
Defendant:
Brandrep LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Floyd Eugene Bender, Jr. v. CA, Institution for Men et al
as 2:2021cv03310
Respondent:
Warden James Hill and CA, Institution for Men
Petitioner:
Floyd Eugene Bender, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeffery Floyd Beadle v. Kathleen Allison
as 2:2021cv03021
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Petitioner:
Jeffery Floyd Beadle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC)Bender v. Segovia et al
as 3:2021cv00575
Defendant:
A. Daniel, Gomez, R. Katayal and others
Plaintiff:
Floyd Eugene Bender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
