Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 248
Christopher Jeburk v. Francisco Quintana
as 17-55215
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE JEBURK
Respondent - Appellee: FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Warden, USP Victorville
Travis v. Quintana We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00061
Petitioner: Robby Travis
Defendant: Francisco J. Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Darrell Parks v. L Ferguson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-55092
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee: L FERGUSON, Correctional Counselor, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity, TIMOTHY BAKER, Case Manager, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity, MARK TIPTON, Unit Manager, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity and others
Vivek Shah v. Francisco Quintana
as 17-5053
Petitioner - Appellant: VIVEK SHAH
Respondent - Appellee: FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Warden
Shah v. Quintana We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00028
Petitioner: Vivek Shah
Respondent: Francisco J. Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Haynes v. Quintana We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00009
Petitioner: Adrian Christopher Haynes
Respondent: Francisco J. Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tracy Pittman v. Francisco Quintana
as 16-6857
Petitioner - Appellant: TRACY DEWAYNE PITTMAN
Respondent - Appellee: FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Warden
Shah v. Quintana We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00472
Petitioner: Vivek Shah
Respondent: Francisco J. Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Willie Boyd v. Francisco Quintana
as 16-6774
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIE E. BOYD
Respondent - Appellee: FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Warden
Holt v. USA et al
as 5:2016cv00447
Plaintiff: Kai Holt
Defendant: USA and Francisco J. Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?