Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, et al
as 08-1278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC., GLOBAL NAPS, INC., CHESAPEAKE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, JAMES CONNELLY and others
:
, , and others
Verizon New York Inc. et al v. Global Naps, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv04459
Plaintiff:
Verizon New York Inc., Verizon New England Inc., Verizon New Jersey Inc. and others
Defendant:
Global Naps, Inc., Global Naps New York, Inc., Global Naps Virginia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Southern New England Telephone Company et al v. Global Naps, Inc. et al
as 1:2007mc00043
Plaintiff:
Southern New England Telephone Company and Pacific Bell Telephone Co.
Defendant:
Global Naps, Inc. and Global Naps, California, Inc.
Respondent:
BABP (VI), LLC
The Southern New England Telephone Co v. Global NAPS, Inc. et al
as 1:2007mc10087
Defendant:
Global NAPs, Inc., Global NAPS New Hampshire, Inc., Global NAPS Networks, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
The Southern New England Telephone Company and The Southern New England Telephone Company
Movant:
Select & Pay, Inc.
Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, et al
as 1:2002cv12489
Plaintiff:
Global NAPs, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon New England, Inc. , Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy , Paul B. Vasington and others
Trustee:
South Coastal Bank, Bank of America, AT&T Corporation and others
Counter_claimant:
Verizon New England, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
1120 Hancock Street, Inc. , Chesapeake Investment Services, Inc. , Ferrous Miner Holdings, Ltd. and others
Movant:
Air Maryland, LLC , BABP,LLC , BroadVoice, Inc and others
Respondent:
Global Financial Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: JS 44 Sec. IV - no matching citation currently in database
WrldCom Inc v. FCC, et al
as 01-1218
Petitioner:
WorldCom Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Sprint Corporation, Association of Communications Enterprises, Competitive Telecommunications Association and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Terminated Party:
VoiceStream Wireless Corporation
Global Naps Inc v. FCC, et al
as 01-1192
Petitioner:
Global Naps, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Verizon Telephone Companies, Contel of the South, Inc., doing business as Verizon Mid-States, GTE Midwest Incorporated, doing business as Verizon Midwest and others
Global Naps Inc v. FCC, et al
as 00-1136
Petitioner:
Global Naps, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Verizon Delaware, Inc., Verizon Maryland, Inc., Verizon New England Inc. and others
:
, , and others
AT&T Corp v. FCC
as 99-1538
Appellant - Appellant:
AT&T Corporation
Appellee - Appellee:
Federal Communications Commission
Intervenor:
New York Telephone Company, doing business as Bell Atlantic-NY, Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc., NYNEX Long Distance Company and others
Terminated Party:
CTSI, Inc.
Intervenor For Appellee:
Rhythms NetConnections, Inc. and Competitive Telecommunications Association
Intervenor For Appellant:
CloseCall America, Inc.
:
Bell Atl Tele Cos v. FCC, et al
as 99-1094
Petitioner:
Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Telecommunications Resellers Association, People of the State of California, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California and others
Intervenor:
AirTouch Communications, Inc., Information Technology Association of America, AT&T Corporation and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
Global Naps, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
