Cases 61 - 70 of 309
(HC) Chavez v. Gamboa
as 2:2022cv01173
Petitioner:
Ulises Chavez
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jaime Rodolfo Lopez v. Martin Gamboa
as 2:2022cv04281
Petitioner:
Jaime Rodolfo Lopez
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gamboa-Acosta v. PVH Retail Stores, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00818
Plaintiff:
Jesus Gamboa-Acosta
Defendant:
PVH Retail Stores, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 lm Removal- Labor/Mgmt. Relations
Edgar A. Gamboa, M.D., Medical Corp. v. Becerra
as 5:2022cv02865
Plaintiff:
Edgar A. Gamboa, M.D., Medical Corp.
Defendant:
Secretary Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Kelly v. Allen et al
as 4:2022cv02719
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
T. Allen, Atenley, Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Randy Baker v. Martin Gamboa
as 8:2022cv00806
Petitioner:
Adam Randy Baker
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Meyers v. Kernan et al
as 1:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Leon Lee Meyers
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, K. Allison, R. Gamboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benito Miranda Hernandez v. Martin Gamboa
as 8:2022cv00470
Petitioner:
Benito Miranda Hernandez
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin et al v. Scripps Health et al
as 3:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Michelle Franklin and Irene Gamboa
Defendant:
Scripps Health and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 fl FLSA: Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
(PC) Valles v. Gamboa et al
as 1:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
Frank Valles
Defendant:
Martin Gamboa, B. Shults and Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
