Cases 61 - 70 of 129
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. PTO
as 21-1708
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00504
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00447
Counter Defendant:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
HYATT v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
as 1:2018cv02800
Plaintiff:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Hirshfeld
as 1:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld and Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
