Cases 61 - 70 of 121
Jacobs v. Mohr et al
as 3:2016cv01908
Plaintiff:
Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Crawford, J. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bismillah v. Mohr et al
as 3:2016cv01374
Plaintiff:
Bismillah
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, A. Bender, Ohio State University Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeNoma v. Kasich et al
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeNoma
Defendant:
John R. Kasich, Ted Strickland, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Solano County Courts et al
as 2:2015cv02754
Plaintiff:
Otis Lee Rodgers
Defendant:
Solano County Courts, Jackson K. Harris, Sara Andrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01408
Plaintiff:
Lola Jean Griffith and Russell Griffith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01388
Plaintiff:
Russell Kenneth Griffith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Griffith et al
as 2:2015cv00778
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Michael Griffith and Ruth Griffith
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Brown et al v. Florida Coastal Partners, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Brown and Tonya L. Brown
Defendant:
Florida Coastal Partners, LLC, Charles R Griffith, Delaware County Court of Common Pleas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Griffith et al v. DirectBuy, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02383
Plaintiff:
Aaron Griffith and Kimberly Griffith
Defendant:
DirectBuy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02008
Plaintiff:
Judy Griffith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
