Cases 61 - 70 of 102
ROBINSON v. OWENS et al
as 5:2013cv00292
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ROBINSON
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Williams et al
as 6:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Roy Mandell Smith
Defendant:
Stanley Williams, James Deal, James Donald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Hinton
as 1:2013cv01286
Plaintiff:
Malcolm S. Pratt
Defendant:
James A. Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOTT v. DOE et al
as 5:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
MACK HENRY LOTT
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
CHASTIN BETRON MOORE
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON, CLAUDIA HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOTT v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2013cv00058
Plaintiff:
MACK HENRY LOTT and HASKELL TORRENC
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON and JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lott et al v. McLaughlin et al
as 4:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Mack Henry Lott and Haskell Torrenc
Defendant:
Gregory McLaughlin, James Hinton and Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROGERS v. HINTON et al
as 5:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN LEE ROGERS
Defendant:
JAMES HINTON, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. FLENORY et al
as 5:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
WILLIE B BUTLER
Defendant:
BRANDON FLENORY, DON BLAKELY, JAMES HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill-Hinton v. Bank of America NA et al
as 1:2012cv04350
Defendant:
Bank of America NA , Pendergast & Associates PC , BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and others
Plaintiff:
Wanda Hill-Hinton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
