Cases 61 - 70 of 103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez-Torres et al v. Del-Valle-Negron et al
as 3:2013cv01610
Defendant:
Luis A. Del-Valle-Negron, Jane Doe, Del-Valle-Doe-Conjugal-Partnership and others
Plaintiff:
Jose A Rodriguez-Torres , Madelaine Torres-Santiago , PRT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Garcia-Rivera v. USA
as 3:2013cv01235
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Rodriguez-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rodriguez-Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2013cv01074
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Rodriguez-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garcia v. Simple Factory et al
as 3:2013cv01056
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Simple Factory , Jorge E. Rodriguez, Margarita Hopgood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Polanco-Rodriguez
as 3:2012cv01994
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Polanco-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 Federal Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rios-DaSilva et al v. One, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01286
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Rios-DaSilva and Elizabeth DaSilva
Defendant:
One, Inc. and Jose Amid Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
