Cases 61 - 70 of 159
Flores v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv05527
Defendant:
City of New York, Sergeant John Doe, Police Officer John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Enrique Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cosme v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv05535
Defendant:
City of New York, Sergeant John Doe, Police Officers John Doe(S) and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Cosme
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hindu-Robles v. MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2017cv05487
Defendant:
Brooklyn Hospital, Jane Roe(s), John Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Nicholas Hindu-Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porche v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04773
Plaintiff:
Timothy Porche
Defendant:
City of New York, Nicole Brown and John Does and/or Jane Roes Nos. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Roe
as 2:2017cv02911
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Carlson et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Marcela Carlson
Defendant:
City of New York, Corizon Health Inc. , Corizon Health Clinical Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ghany v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv03786
Defendant:
City of New York, John and/or Jane Roes Nos. 1-10, P.O. Jennifer Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Hameed Ghany
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alvira v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04677
Plaintiff:
William Alvira
Defendant:
City of New York, O'Brien, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Li v. Lorenzo et al
as 1:2016cv04092
Plaintiff:
Feng Li
Defendant:
Faith Lorenzo, Gary Casella, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CB et al v. St. Vincent's Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02282
Plaintiff:
CB
Defendant:
St. Vincent's Services, Inc. , Heart Share Human Services of New York , Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
