Cases 61 - 70 of 231
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MALLORY v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02544
Plaintiff:
JOEL EDWARD MALLORY
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, NANCY PELOSI, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRONS v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02451
Plaintiff:
TONI IRONS
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN and KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATEL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv02263
Defendant:
INDIA, UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEIN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2021cv02160
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BEIN, BRIAN BENGIER, JUSTIN BISCIAIO and others
Not Classified By Court:
RHONDA COMSTOCK, KC BROWN, KYLE BROWN and others
Defendant:
The Islamic Republic of Iran and ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
HENDERSON v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02183
Petitioner:
TAVARRES HENDERSON
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US BANK, NA v. STEPHENS et al
as 1:2021cv02092
Plaintiff:
US BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
BARBARA STEPHENS and JOE STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
GRATION et al vs. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2021cv01859
Defendant:
IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS and others
Plaintiff:
JUDITH ELLEN GRATION, JONATHAN SCOTT GRATION, JR., BARRY GORDON BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
WOODSON v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv01865
Petitioner:
ANTONIO DAMARCUS WOODSON
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
