Cases 61 - 70 of 284
Odums v. Stumpf et al
as 1:2019cv06815
Defendant:
John Stumpf, Rossana Rosado, Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Odums
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carthen v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2019cv06392
Defendant:
John Doe, Hilary Gingold, Juana Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Laval Carthen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Utley v. Beideman et al
as 1:2019cv04798
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Noach Dear, Bruno Codispoti, Esq., The Kings County Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Natasha Utley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kings County Waterproofing Corp. v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv04584
Plaintiff:
Kings County Waterproofing Corp.
Defendant:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04754
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fludd v. Marroquin et al
as 1:2019cv04919
Plaintiff:
Norman Fludd
Defendant:
NYPD Officer Marroquin, King's County District Attorney's Office, New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04246
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00989
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
