Cases 61 - 70 of 307
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv03116
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Thomas
Defendant:
Nicholas M. Greene, El Dorado Correctional Facility and Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2021cv03109
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections and Michelle Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Jamal Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thacher v. (lnu) et al
as 5:2021cv03098
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu), Hutchinson Regional Medical Center and Kansas Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Trent M. Thacher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris (ID 62300) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03093
Defendant:
Kansas, State of and Kansas Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Davon M. Morris, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Hitchcock et al
as 2:2021cv02141
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Evan Hitchcock, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell (ID 6010477) v. Hitchcock et al
as 5:2021cv03092
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Evan Hitchcock, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delaney (ID 72292) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2021cv03056
Defendant:
Dale R. Call, Samuel Cline, Matthew C. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
John K. Delaney
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buie v. Kansas Department of Corrections
as 5:2021cv03025
Plaintiff:
Natasha Buie
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Zmuda
as 21-3010
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Kansas Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARABIA JABBAR JOHNSON
Sperry v. Wildermuth, et al
as 21-3009
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, BILL SHIPMAN, (FNU) HUNT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY J. SPERRY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.