Cases 61 - 70 of 535
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv06627
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
The City of New York, Silverstein Properties, Inc., Steven Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Staller Associates Realty, Inc. v. Arlona Limited Partnership et al
as 2:2022cv04266
Plaintiff:
Staller Associates Realty, Inc.
Defendant:
Arlona Limited Partnership, Lus Licensing, LLC and Levin Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Ryan v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv05111
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
Natus Medical Incorporated, Thomas J. Sullivan, Joshua H. Levine and others
Mortman v. Natus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04951
Plaintiff:
Frederick Mortman
Defendant:
Natus Medical, Inc., Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Waterman v. Natus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03341
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
Natus Medical, Inc., Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Whitfield v. Natus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03302
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Natus Medical, Inc., Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Stein v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv04423
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Natus Medical Incorporated, Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Schallman v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv04391
Plaintiff:
Nanci Schallman
Defendant:
Natus Medical Incorporated, Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
Lavery v. Rotondi et al
as 1:2022cv02830
Plaintiff:
Alfred K. Lavery
Defendant:
Anthony Rotondi, Keith Longden, Leahy Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plascencia et al v. Levine et al
as 7:2022cv03214
Counter Defendant:
Martha Plascencia and Cesar Plascencia
Counter Claimant:
Eric Levine and Amanda Goutremout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
