Cases 61 - 70 of 117
Drinkard v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00303
Plaintiff:
Samuel Drinkard
Defendant:
Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Fresenius USA, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00151
Plaintiff:
Jannie Murphy
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
John Murphy
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Massey v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
Charlene O. Massey
Defendant:
Murphy Oil USA, Inc. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wright v. Murphy Oil Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00110
Plaintiff:
Kijafa Wright
Defendant:
Murphy Oil Corporation, Murphy Oil USA, Inc., Sherri Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. CERT (MCT) a.k.a Black Team et al
as 3:2013cv00980
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown Wimdal , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. CERT (MCT) a.k.a Black Team et al
as 4:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Johnson
Defendant:
CERT (MCT) a.k.a Black Team, Unknown Dykes, Unknown Wimdal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Murphy et al
as 3:2012cv00746
Plaintiff:
Ocie Hoskins, Jr.
Defendant:
Tiffany Murphy, Christopher Epps and James Holman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Raymond Detention Center et al
as 3:2012cv00519
Plaintiff:
Melvin Chandler
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi, Tyrone Lewis, Lieutenant Theralon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. Lewis et al
as 3:2012cv00442
Defendant:
Tyrone Lewis, Unknown Matthews, Michael Ivy and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Tyrone Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
