Cases 61 - 70 of 138
Anthony v. Sheahan
as 14-760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert E. Anthony
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Sheahan, Superintendent
Guarneri v. Bartlett et al
as 6:2014cv06054
Plaintiff:
Joseph Guarneri
Defendant:
Ricky A Bartlett, John Doe, A. Parso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gizewski v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
Mark Gizewski
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Michael Sheahan, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Sauve
as 14-230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Porter
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheila Sauve, Prison Guard, Upstate Correctional Facility, Individual Capacity, Cherie Fairchild, Registered Nurse, Upstate Correctional Facility, Individual Capacity, Candy Atkinson, Registered Nurse, Upstate Correctional Facility, Individual Capacity and others
Allah v. Ryan et al
as 6:2014cv06029
Petitioner:
Khalaire Allah
Respondent:
Scott P. Ryan, N. Arquitt, Robert Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Dawly et al
as 6:2013cv06636
Plaintiff:
Dion Harrison
Defendant:
Dawly, Michael Sheahan, Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Dawly et al
as 1:2013cv06465
Defendant:
C.O. Dawly, C.O. John Doe, Medical Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dion Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Sheahan et al
as 6:2013cv06594
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Houston
Defendant:
Michael Sheahan, M. Thoms, Coveny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryson v. Sheahan
as 13-4002
Petitioner - Appellant:
Ronald Bryson
Respondent - Appellee:
Michael Sheahan, Superintendent of Five Points Correctional Facility
Saracina v. Sheahan
as 13-3906
Petitioner:
Scott A. Saracina
Respondent:
Michael Sheahan, Superintendent Five Points Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
