Cases 61 - 70 of 611
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
UA Local 13 Pension Fund v. Bumble Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00624
Plaintiff:
UA Local 13 Pension Fund
Defendant:
Bumble Inc., Whitney Wolfe Herd, Anuradha B. Subramanian and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In Re: Oasis Focus Fund LP
as 1:2022mc00024
Petitioner:
Oasis Focus Fund LP and Quadre Investments, L.P.
Respondent:
Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Allison v. Oak Street Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Reginald T. Allison and City of Dearborn Police & Fire Revised Retirement System
Defendant:
Oak Street Health, Inc., Michael Pykosz, Timothy Cook and others
Petitioner:
Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore, Employees Retirement System of the City of Kansas City, Missouri, Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund - Defined Benefit Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Litovich v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Isabel Litovich, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Holdcraft Marital Trust, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, BofA Securities, Inc. and others
Yu v. Mendoza et al
as 3:2021cv09039
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Yu and Jason T. Yu
Defendant:
Mae-Lin Mendoza, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banerjee v. Zhangmen Education Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09634
Plaintiff:
Saurav Banerjee
Defendant:
Zhangmen Education Inc., Yi Zhang, Ricky Kwok Yin Ng and others
Lead Plaintiff:
Yanhong Chen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
SL-X Trading Europe Limited v. Bank Of America Corporation
as 21-2699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SL-x Technology USA LLC, SL-x Trading Europe Ltd., SL-x Technology UK Ltd. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp., Merrill Lynch L.P. Holdings, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
