Cases 61 - 70 of 689
Lawrence Hash v. C. Williams, et al
as 12-16316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH
Defendant - Appellee:
C. WILLIAMS, BARBARA HAUG, V. M. VACA and others
Fratus v. California Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2012cv00906
Plaintiff:
John Fratus
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, - Callow, Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sean Fisher v. Director of CDC, et al
as 12-16135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAN C. FISHER
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF CDC, N. GRANNIS, Chief of Inmate Appeals, D.L. RUNNELS, Warden, High Desert State Prison and others
Lamont Tarkington v. G. Lewis, et al
as 12-16095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMONT TARKINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
G. D. LEWIS, C. M. PATTEN, R. L. JOHNSON and others
Alfredo Cervantes v. J. Woodford, et al
as 12-16066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFREDO GONSALES CERVANTES
Defendant - Appellee:
J. WOODFORD, Director of CDCR, JAMES A. YATES, Warden, N. GRANNIS, Chief Inmate Appeals and others
Bob Savage v. Suzan Hubbard, et al
as 12-15931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOB SAVAGE
Defendant - Appellee:
SUZAN HUBBARD, R.L. ANDREASEN, MANUEL SABIN and others
Joaquin Quiroz v. J. Reynoso, et al
as 12-15929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOAQUIN RAMON QUIROZ
Defendant - Appellee:
J. REYNOSO, F. VASQUEZ, H. ORTIZ and others
Jesse Shavers, Jr. v. D. Clark, et al
as 12-15596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE LEE SHAVERS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
D. CLARK, T. ROBERTSON and N. GRANNIS
Byron Franklin v. Randy Grounds, et al
as 12-15552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY GROUNDS, Warden, N. GRANNIS, Chief Inmate Appeals, J. CHUDY, Chief Med Officer and others
Kirk Williams v. USDC, Sacramento
as 12-70742
:
In re: KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Petitioner:
KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
USDC, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, LASSEN COUNTY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
