Cases 61 - 70 of 639
Russell v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00507
Petitioner:
Christopher Jose Russell
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morales v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00506
Petitioner:
Jesus Morales, Jr.
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Suttles v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00490
Petitioner:
Jesus Suttles
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Apolinaris v. Quarterman
as 6:2009cv00150
Petitioner:
James Dominic Apolinaris
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Quarterman
as 7:2009cv00058
Petitioner:
Charles William Robertson
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00479
Petitioner:
Joey Martinez
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tutt v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division et al
as 5:2009cv00477
Plaintiff:
William Tutt
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division and Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. Quarterman
as 6:2009cv00145
Petitioner:
Gail Smith
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eggleston v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00463
Petitioner:
Thomas Eggleston, III
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller
as 5:2009cv00462
Petitioner:
David Miller
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
