Cases 61 - 70 of 79
NGUYEN v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2017mc01048
Plaintiff:
TU NGUYEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: Complaint
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
AMERICAN LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2015cv00682
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. , AMERICAN LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERS, L.P. , AMERICAN LOGISTICSINTERNATIONAL WAREHOUSING & DISTRIBUTION PARTNERS, L.P. and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , JEH CHARLES JOHNSON , CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
BUTLER v. SHERIFF DEPARTMENT OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY et al
as 1:2013cv01681
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER DESHAWN BUTLER
Respondent:
SHERIFF DEPARTMENT OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, ROBERT PRESLEY DETENTION CENTER, SMITH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MANCHIE v. NGUYEN et al
as 1:2011cv00552
Plaintiff:
EDMOND MACHIE
Defendant:
CHARLES C. NGUYEN and SAMEH ELSHARKAWY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COSTELLO et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
DANNY COSTELLO and GAI NGUYEN
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TRAN v. FAIRFAX PUBLIC ACCESS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2010cv01090
Plaintiff:
THIEN TRAN
Defendant:
FAIRFAX PUBLIC ACCESS CORPORATION, LIEM DUONG BUI and BE BAY NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
