Cases 61 - 70 of 142
TUCKER v. PARKER et al
as 1:2017cv02706
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. TUCKER
Defendant:
CARL D. PARKER, AEAONMS, INC., CHARLES DAVENPORT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEREBEE v. U-HAUL et al
as 1:2017cv02147
Plaintiff:
RENEE FEREBEE
Defendant:
U-HAUL, CHRISTOPHER PARKER and AMANDA KIRSCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. JEFFERSON-11TH STREET, LLC et. al
as 1:2017cv01652
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant:
ELLIS J. PARKER , JEFFERSON-11TH STREET, LLC , SCF MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOLT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv00973
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA PAUL HILTON HOLT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MILITARY, SECRET SERVICE AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL v. O'BRIEN et al
as 1:2017mc00630
Plaintiff:
PATRICK WAYNE BELL
Defendant:
PATRICIA O'BRIEN, STEFANIE WILLIAMS, MATTHEW GREER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHABAZZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT SERVICES AND SUPERVISION AGENCY et al
as 1:2017cv00476
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT SERVICES AND SUPERVISION AGENCY, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES , NANCY WARE and others
Plaintiff:
MAHDI M. SHABAZZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARKER v. USA
as 1:2016cv02233
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DARNELL PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DOE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2016cv02159
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEAN PERRY, STEPHEN GRIMM and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JONES et al v. ATCHINSON et al
as 1:2016cv02142
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES, LAFAYETTE DOTSON, ADONNIS ATCHINSON and others
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, PHIL MENDELSON, KENNYAN MUDUFFIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
