Cases 61 - 70 of 224
Koenig v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2017cv01200
Plaintiff:
Bruce W. Koenig
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Stephen T. Moyer, Maryland Division of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shamsud'Diyn v. Morgan et al
as 1:2017cv01160
Plaintiff:
Khalid Shamsud'Diyn
Defendant:
J. Philip Morgan, Sergeant Eubanks, Corporal Igwe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enow v. Armstrong & Cheris, Chartered et al
as 8:2017cv00841
Plaintiff:
Ndokey Enow
Defendant:
Armstrong & Cheris, Chartered, Philip H. Armstrong, Esq and Howard R. Cheris, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moment v. Morgan
as 8:2017cv00786
Plaintiff:
Michael Moment
Defendant:
J. Philip Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seton v. Imported Cars of Maryland et al
as 8:2017cv00569
Plaintiff:
Philip B. Seton
Defendant:
Imported Cars of Maryland, Isaac Ajayi and Bruno Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Salley v. Debrabandere et al
as 1:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Todd Salley
Defendant:
Lode Debrabandere, Dwayne Montgomery, Philip R. Jacoby, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palya v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 8:2016cv03669
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Palya, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, J. Philip Morgan and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hare v. Nichols
as 8:2016cv03321
Plaintiff:
Delfon L Hare, Sr.
Defendant:
Philip C. Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hare v. Shim et al
as 8:2016cv03296
Plaintiff:
Delfon Lebrew Hare, Sr.
Defendant:
Jae B. Shim, Antonio Hill, Harold Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sardi's Enterprises, Ltd. v. Sardis Catering, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv02994
Plaintiff:
Sardi's Enterprises, LTD
Defendant:
Sardis Catering, Inc., Sardi's Holdings, Inc., Sardi's Franchise Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
