Cases 61 - 70 of 176
Mills et al v. Piper Aircraft, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv03038
Plaintiff:
Trina Mills , Chanda Mills and Estate of Larry Mills
Defendant:
Piper Aircraft, Inc. and Blue Goose Aviation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mills, et al., v. Piper Aircraft, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv03000
Defendant:
Piper Aircraft, Inc. and Blue Goose Aviation, LLC
Plaintiff:
Trina Mills , Chanda Mills and Estate of Larry Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Piper Lakay et al v. County of San Bernardino, California
as 5:2017cv00042
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, California
Plaintiff:
Piper Lakay and Ellis Snowton
Alfaro et al v. San Diego, City of et al
as 3:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Marcus Alfaro , Derrin Austin and Piper Denlinger
Defendant:
San Diego, City of and Brian Fennessy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Piper v. Harveys Casino et al
as 2:2016cv02374
Plaintiff:
Douglas Piper
Defendant:
Harveys Casino, Barton Hospital and South Lake Tahoe Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig Wiencek v. Nantkwest, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06705
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, Cambridge Equities LP, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Wiencek
Michael Hare et al v. Nantkwest, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06697
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, Cambridge Equities LP, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hare and Norman Jacobs
Justin T. Wagner v. Nantkwest, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06703
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, Cambridge Equities LP, Citigroup Global Markets Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Wagner
Kenneth Frye v. Nantkwest, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06700
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, Cambridge Equities LP, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Frye
da Luz v. Fitbit, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv03381
Defendant:
Fitbit, Inc. , James Park , Eric N. Friedman and others
Plaintiff:
Ana da Luz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
