Cases 61 - 70 of 421
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04525
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
REFRACTORY ENGINEERS, INC. v. RESCO PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2017cv02318
Counter Defendant:
REFRACTORY ENGINEERS, INC.
Plaintiff:
REFRACTORY ENGINEERS, INC.
Counter Claimant:
RESCO PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
RESCO PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
UN4 Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
UN4 Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
UN4 Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2017cv00473
Plaintiff:
UN4 Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
UN4 PRODUCTIONS INC. v. DOE 1 et al
as 1:2017cv02070
Defendant:
DOE 1, DOE 2, DOE 3 and others
Plaintiff:
UN4 PRODUCTIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
UN4 PRODUCTIONS INC. v. DOE 1, et al
as 1:2017cv02037
Defendant:
DOE 1, DOE 10, DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
UN4 PRODUCTIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
