Cases 61 - 70 of 130
FTC v. Kevin Trudeau
as 14-1344
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Appellant:
PERRY KIRALY, YON COLE, LISA BERGAMIN and others
Defendant:
KEVIN TRUDEAU
Appellee:
ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Worldwide Info Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs
Defendant:
Worldwide Info Services, Inc. , Elite Information Solutions Inc. , Absolute Solutions Group Inc. and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Federal Trade Commission v. Cream Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv08843
Defendant:
John Charchian, Sami Charchian, Cream Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Receiver:
Brick Kane and Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Federal Trade Commission v. Applied Marketing Sciences, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv06794
Defendant:
Applied Marketing Sciences, LLC, Liam O. Moran, Standard Registration Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission , State of Illinois , Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. , FHTM, Inc. , Alan Clark Holdings, LLC and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 5:2013mc00030
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, State of Illinois, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc., FHTM, Inc., Alan Clark Holdings, LLC and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans and Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 2:2013mc00006
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, Commonwealth of Kentucky and State of North Carolina
Defendant:
Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc., FHTM, Inc., Alan Clark Holdings, LLC and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans and Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00578
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission , State Of Illinois , Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. , FHTM, Inc. , Alan Clark Holdings, LLC and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Commodity Futures Trading Comm v. Walsh
as 13-105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Appellant:
3M Employee Welfare Benefit Association Trust I, 3M Employee Welfare Benefit Association Trust II, 3M Employee Welfare Benefit Association Trust III and others
Claimant - Appellant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association National Retirement Trust
Defendant:
Stephen Walsh, Paul Greenwood, Westridge Capital Management, Inc. and others
Appellee:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Intervenor:
San Diego County Employees Retirement Association, University of Pittsburgh - Of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education, United States of America and others
Securities and Exchange Commis v. WG Trading Investors, L.P.
as 13-106
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Appellant:
3M Employee Welfare Benefit Association Trust I, 3M Employee Welfare Benefit Association Trust II, 3M Employee Welfare Benefit Association Trust III and others
Claimant - Appellant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association National Retirement Trust
Defendant:
WG Trading Investors, L.P., WG Trading Company, Limited Partnership., Westridge Capital Management, Inc. and others
Appellee:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Intervenor:
San Diego County Employees Retirement Association, University of Pittsburgh - Of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education, United States of America and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
